Adobe Photoshop Elements 2019 , is the most waste of time . Straight out , just crap . If you are serios Photografer , use free program
. etc rawtherapi ore Dxo . And GIMP . Photoshop Elementa are to iPhone users ind beyond , and not fore serios photografier . . Waste of money , and profit fore the company . Goodbye Adobe . You lost your grab
Gentile Abambo,
Ho messo al corrente della situazione il mio fidanzato.
Lui stesso chiede se è possibile riattivare il piano e spostarlo al suo account adobe, è vostro cliente e ha già dei piani attivi.
Resto in attesa di un tuo riscontro.
Grazie.
If I restart, it will be okay for some minutes and then get back to making straight lines, every brush is having this same effect. I already tried resetting preferences, the program and even my pc, but nothing. (Im using a mouse)
Ex:
You're welcome, if you don't like the standard icons, you can change them to coffee cups or even toast
Thanks Wilson. Yes, I suppose something like what you say is necessary. I just wanted to know what that code would be and how and where to insert it. I think that not being able to insert special symbols in an answer is one of the limitations of the Captivate program.
I will continue waiting for possible solutions. I appreciate your response.
JCAB
I have windows 10 pro activate with the latest update
I cannot reproduce problem in Photoshop 20.0.2 on Windows. There is no problem to assign new keyboard shortcut with Ctrl key.
Hallo!
Ich bekomme eine Excell Liste mit ca. 100 Namen und den dazugehörigen funktionen in der Firma. Jede Person wurde interviewt und soll dementsprechend mit einer Bauchbinde versehen werden. Besteht die Möglichkeit eine Exceltabelle in Premiere Pro CC zu verknüpfen, sodass mit die Bauchbinden automatissch generiert werden? Oder muss ich alle Bauchbinden per Copy&Paste bearbeiten?
Vielen Dank für Eure Hilfe!
digital_vibe wrote
2. A suggestion was made to scan as TIFF as this will be better for long term archiving purposes, which makes sense but as these will eventually be made available to family members who will likely use some kind of online photo printing service and many of these do not accept TIFF files, I’ll likely have to make a duplicate of each TIFF scan as JPG. Does this present any particular issues/challenges?
The main reason for using tiff is that jpg is unsuited for edting. Edit the tiffs, and use the Image processor script to create jpgs from the tiffs. (File > Scripts > Image processor) If you're familiar with Lightroom, you can import the scans and do editing there. (retouching is best done in Photoshop before importing) Then you can export jpgs from Lightroom.
3. It was suggested that to give me greater flexibility down the road, I scan to a resolution of 4800 PPI. I’ve found I can achieve this by manually overriding Photoshops default max of 600 but in so doing the scanning process is incredibly slow and the file output size very high ( a 3”x3” photo scanned in this manner is over 40MB in size). Given that I need to scan through hundreds of photos I’m not sure that such a process is feasible especially as I’m then presented with storage challenges. Given this, is there a compromise here that provides me a high resolution file that will work well for re-printing as well as providing good archiving and flexibility down the road?
When scanning prints, there is no advantage in scanning at such a high resolution. 600 ppi is plenty, and you will probably be fine with 300 ppi. By testing, you can find out if there is any advantage in scanning at 600 ppi. Scan one image at 300 ppi, then scan the same image at 600 ppi. Then change the ppi to 300 in the 600 ppi file – go to Image > Image size, and change the ppi to 300 with Resample checked. Now compare the two images at 100% view.
4. In terms of software, I’m not using anything that came bundled with the Canon scanner, rather I’m relying solely on Photoshop.
It seems that you're using File > Import > WIA support for scanning, which is a method that gives you very few options. I suggest that you use the software that came with the scanner, which should give you more control and more options. Save the image in the scanning software, then open it in Photoshop.
Why have all pdf files received lately gone straight to my download folder? for years I had a choice on screen whether to save or open, most frustrating. Do I need to go back to an older version? if so which one please. Thank you.
mac os10.11.6でInDesign cc2015を使っています。jpgに書き出すと画像にノイズのような線が入ったり、画像がガタガタにズレる現象が起こっています。
pdfで書き出すとそれらの現象は起こりません。治す方法はありませんか？
Hi
Are you talking about the .psd icon, what OS are you using
Have you checked the default application settings
Thank you. I'll look at this feature.
digital_vibe wrote
It was suggested that to give me greater flexibility down the road, I scan to a resolution of 4800 PPI.
That's for scanning film - transparencies or negatives. Scanning prints is something else altogether. Anything beyond, say, 300 or so is very likely wasted and not adding any detail. But just to be on the safe side you can use 600.
Select the stroke and from the top menu.
Object - path - outline stroke
This will turn the path to an object.
In the pathfinder pallet us the divide and conquer as usual.
Everything depend on what you want to achieve but here is one way how to replace background:
You ideally do NOT want to see this orange line above your clips, Nicolas. (At least until you add effects to your video.)
When you DON'T see this orange line, you know your project is properly set up.
Thanks - but that didn't work either.
Out of interest, under the File Handling, I do not have Thumbnail as you do.
When you say "render" do you mean rendering the timeline (which improves the look of the video in the Monitor panel) or do you mean actually outputting your movie?
Rendering your timeline is for your preview only. There are ways to improve it, but its purpose is only to make your movie play more smoothly. It has nothing to do with your final output.
If you're talking about your final output, if both version 15 and version 2019 are using the same source video and the same project settings and Export & Share options, the results should be identical.
So, before we dig deeper, let's make sure we're talking about the same type of "rendering".
“The image I submitted had no watermark, of course.”